Carlos Maza: The media’s panic about antifa reflects an old bias in the way journalists cover protest movements (don’t fall for the antifa trap presented by media).
Carlos Maza around 2017 began working at Vox Media, where he successfully proposed and developed Strikethrough and began producing and hosting the series. Strikethrough was canceled in July 2019. Maza left Vox Media in February 2020, and started a media-critique channel on YouTube. In an interview with Business Insider in January 2020, Maza voiced his dissatisfaction with YouTube for refusing to remove Steven Crowder’s videos that repeatedly featured jokes about Maza’s sexuality and race. Maza panned YouTube in the Business Insider interview and said he “might as well flood its airwaves with leftist propaganda” by returning to the platform as an independent creator.
Carlos Maza was in an online feud with Steven Crowder, and eventually in June 2019, Crowder’s YouTube videos were investigated for alleged repeated use of racist and homophobic slurs to describe Carlos Maza. The channel was not suspended, with YouTube saying, “the videos as posted don’t violate our policies”. His channel was demonetized the following day, with YouTube stating this could be reversed if Crowder addressed “all of the issues” with his channel “Louder with Crowder” citing community guidelines. Crowder posted a parody apology “I’m sorry” on June 3, 2019, without mentioning Maza.
UPDATE (June 6, 2019):
Youtube says Crowder engaged in ‘egregious actions that harmed the broader community’ with his far-right videos; The Intercept co-founding editor Glenn Greenwald reacts on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight.’
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT POLARIZED TOPICS: This article is identified as describing a highly controversial topic with controversial human subject(s). Articles in this publication are posted for information only, and are not intended to promote, endorse, or criticize any of the human subjects described, unless endorsements, criticism or opinions are explicitly expressed. The intention of the articles is to provide a process to understand the conflict described, and the players involved in the conflict — not to provide a conclusive decision (since articles very likely have insufficient information). Quotations from subjects in articles are not purported to be true or false; or agreeable or disagreeable unless explicitly expressed. Quotations from subjects consist of documentation of a subject’s statement at a specific date and time. Any perceived bias in this article may be caused by the reader(s) misinterpreting the source of quotations, the reader(s) projection of their own emotional response connected to disagreeable content, or due to the reader(s) jumping to conclusions about a news article that is many times an incomplete work in progress as part of a continuum in the range of the entire blog or publication. Readers are encouraged to use this article as a stepping stone combined with other articles from this publication and/or outside publications to increase understanding of the topic and involved subject(s). In other words, this article is not the FINAL WORD by any stretch of the imagination.